For Hawking, God isn’t essential to comprehend the universe. To Hawking, God is a human contrivance, according to excerpts of his latest book, “The Grand Design,” co-authored with Caltech physicist Leonard Mlodinow. There have been controversies between scientific research and religion. The Grand Design talks about some of these. The law of gravity, not God, is what made the creation of the universe possible, Hawking says within the book. There are numerous who oppose the theories of Hawking. They suggest that the galaxy can’t be understood simply with scientific research that is limited with laws. Source of article – Stephen Hawking God is not necessary to understand the universe by Personal Money Store.
Is Stephen Hawking or Sir Isaac Newton right?
Sir Isaac Newton beliefs are challenged in “The Grand Design.” This is Stephen Hawking’s new book. Newton believed the universe was intended by God. The universe isn’t something Newton believed could exist on its own. It could not have just randomly come together so well. Hawking is opposed to this. He believes the whole world was created by the force of gravity. Hawking believed in God in 1998 when his book became bestseller. This book, reports the Guardian, is called “A Brief History of Time”. He nevertheless believed in God’s role within the galaxy then. He even wrote about this within the book. ”If we discover a complete theory, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason – for then we should know the mind of God,” he explained then.
Hawking bets on science to win
Hawking was one of Newton’s successors, holding the prestigious title of Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at Cambridge in London. In “The Grand Design,” he writes that he began to doubt Newton’s belief the galaxy could not have formed from chaos in 1992, when a planet was discovered orbiting a distant star. Hawking said that humans simply created a God in their own image to have someone to have a personal relationship with. He said this in an interview with ABC in June. He also said it is impossible considering human life was a complete accident and does not have any significance. Hawking explained his stance to ABC News. He said Science will always win between science and religion.
Hawking needs to explain
People of faith, such as William Crawley at the BCC, disagree with Hawking’s idea of the whole world naturally being created by calling it a “classic agnostic response”. Crawley explains that God is necessary for everybody but apparently Hawking when it comes to understanding the whole world. “The Grand Design” gives no reason, he said, to rule out a religious explanation for the physical laws of the universe. There are scientists that don’t agree with Hawking. They feel he is wrong. Fox News spoke to the president of the International Society for Science and Religion, Professor George Ellis, who explained that if the choice was only science or religion, religion would likely win. “A lot of people will say, OK, I choose religion then,” he explained, “and it is science that will lose out.”